And, and lastly — with caveats — a single other major takeaway: Campos tended to emphasis additional on citywide legislation, whereas Haney’s legislative portfolio is a lot more of an even blend, with ordinances at times centered on the distinct neighborhoods he has represented, instead of San Francisco writ big.

[Here’s every ordinance Matt Haney and David Campos each introduced as San Francisco supervisors.]

There’s not considerably time remaining: The distinctive election to fill the Assembly seat vacated by now-SF City Attorney David Chiu is April 19. And if you’re inquiring oneself, “Didn’t I vote for just one of these fellas presently?” you very properly may well have. Campos, Haney, Bilal Mahmood and Thea Selby all were being listed as candidates for the Assembly seat on the city’s Feb. 15 ballot. But because no one particular acquired a the greater part, a distinctive election was known as in between the best two vote-getters — Campos and Haney. Vote-by-mail ballots were being sent out just last week.

So to support you with that vote, here’s far more on what we found.

How significantly perform did they really do in business? 

To response that, we very first just straight-up counted all the proposed rules the two candidates wrote or sponsored. One particular big caveat: Campos spent 8 a long time on the Board of Supervisors, compared to Haney’s a few.

We Reviewed Every single Regulation Campos and Haney Wrote as SF Supervisors to Enable You Vote in the State Assembly Runoff
Resource: San Francisco Legislative Investigation Centre. (Anna Vignet/KQED)

Ordinances are laws that becomes law, normally drafted by the City Attorney’s Business at the direction of a supervisor, who turns into its “sponsor,” in wonk-talk.

Resolutions, by contrast, are plan statements to categorical acceptance or disapproval, that are introduced at Board of Supervisors meetings and voted on. For instance, an April 2021 resolution sponsored by Haney set the town on history “urging help of getting rid of the United States Senate filibuster.” A January 2010 resolution by Campos identified “the grand re-opening of the Bernal Heights Branch Library and commending the San Francisco Public Library and its crew for their tricky work and dedication to San Francisco and its residents.”

The supervisors vote on it, and — presto, alter-o — it becomes a assertion of file.

Last of all, hearings are conferences of the board, convened by a person or much more supervisors, to request information and facts or views on a matter of fascination, whereby a agent of a metropolis office may well be asked to remedy particular concerns. Often these are a way to shine light-weight on an challenge for general public comprehending, or to set up a sure baseline of details.

Former San Francisco Supervisor Jane Kim, Haney’s predecessor, has not endorsed either candidate, but has very long regarded each of them allies and friends. We questioned Kim to offer her very own investigation on the two candidates’ lawmaking histories.

“Hearing these figures for the 1st time, I would say that both Supervisor Haney and previous Supervisor David Campos are each pretty energetic supervisors legislatively,” explained Kim, who now runs the California Operating People Occasion.

Noting that each candidates usually wrote ordinances immediately influenced by the hearings they named — fairly than prompting just one listening to after an additional without the need of a very clear goal in sight — Kim also suggested hunting at individuals two tallies in tandem to gauge their productiveness.

Campos, for occasion, held a listening to in 2015 to seem into fireplace code inspections of apartment structures following a string of fires in the Mission, a community he represented.

By 2016, Campos had released an ordinance requiring owners of buildings with 3 or much more dwelling models to comply with yearly fireplace alarm testing and inspection necessities each and every two decades, and upgrade current hearth alarm programs, among other changes.

Haney, in the meantime, referred to as a hearing in 2019 to appear into open up-air drug working in the Tenderloin, a longtime difficulty there.

By September 2019, he had convened a road-stage drug-dealing process drive to produce tips for further more motion.

“I do consider that it contributed to the urgency that led to the [Tenderloin] state of emergency and some of the methods that have been deployed,” Haney said of the endeavor force’s conclusions. 1 of those people tips led to the presence of nonprofit City Alchemy’s unarmed ambassadors, Haney stated, who patrol the community to present increased safety.

Which guidelines did the two candidates perform on? 

We categorized Campos and Haney’s legislative histories based on issue place.

Some laws were aimed at spurring housing enhancement or tackling the homelessness disaster, or were being inclusion-linked guidelines aimed at assisting a specific team, like the LGBTQ local community or people of coloration. Other legislation have been meant to assist unique enterprises in each and every supervisor’s district, or a specific neighborhood, like when Haney created a nearby doggy park in Mission Bay. The “reform” classification incorporates new governing administration ethics laws, improved obtain to voting, or cleaned-up mistakes in metropolis code.

Categorizing legislation is additional artwork than science — for occasion, a community wellness law may specifically purpose to enable homeless persons, so is it a wellness treatment law, or a homelessness legislation? We mainly concentrated on who the legislation aimed to help.

A graphic showing percentages of laws passed by assembly candidates David Campos and Matt Haney broken down by category.
Resource: San Francisco Legislative Research Heart. (Anna Vignet/KQED)

Looking at their legislative histories, a person leading-line observation jumps out: The greater part of legal guidelines Campos sponsored had been citywide in scope, as opposed to concentrating on only his community. Haney, by contrast, has launched extra neighborhood-centered legislation. That differentiation could signal how they’d legislate in the Assembly, whilst, as Kim famous, it may perhaps also be circumstantial, specified the open-air drug working, overdose deaths, poverty and homelessness that Haney has tried to tackle in his district.

Also, Kim mentioned, supervisors in the beginnings of their careers have a tendency to target a lot more on the neighborhoods and districts that helped them get elected. But, “as they log on much more decades, they develop into much more citywide in standpoint,” she claimed.

For his aspect, Campos attributed his dearth of neighborhood-facing laws on an inclination to develop citywide answers to difficulties he recognized in his have district.

Navigation facilities that assistance unhoused persons with prolonged stays and connections to products and services are 1 illustration, he claimed. He served get the first navigation center crafted in the Mission District, which he represented. Along with other supervisors, Campos then sponsored legislation to broaden navigation center building in other neighborhoods.

“What we understood after the navigation centre had been open was that no one particular else was opening navigation centers in their district, that ours was the only just one,” Campos mentioned. “That’s an example of some thing that was community-specific that then grew into a more substantial city difficulty.”

Haney explained he has focused extra on his district because the South of Market place and Tenderloin neighborhoods have “a good deal of huge challenges.”

That stated, he trumpeted some of his possess citywide legislation, like putting on the 2020 ballot Proposition B, which split San Francisco’s embattled General public Functions Section into two separate departments, one particular of which now focuses exclusively on sanitation and streets.

Housing: similar problem, diverse techniques

The Assembly candidates tackled housing from noticeably unique angles through their times on the Board of Supervisors.

On the entire, Campos tended to focus on safeguarding present housing, although Haney has targeted far more on enabling new housing design.

Section of this is situational: Haney’s district consists of South of Industry and component of downtown, two neighborhoods that encompass significantly of the city’s improvement. By contrast, Campos’s district consists of the Mission, a hotbed of tenant advocacy.

“When you glance at these two candidates facet by aspect, they’re not heading to differentiate a ton on their positions all over tenant protections, but a voter may perhaps choose that a single prospect just has a higher wealth of working experience in regards to the specialized facets, or just working experience doing the job on tenant-safety legislation,” Kim explained.

In 2013, Campos authored an ordinance to supply Lease Board hearings for tenants who allege landlord harassment. He also sponsored eight more tenant-safety-associated ordinances, like fireplace protections, relocation payments to evicted tenants, tenant buyout agreements, and no-fault eviction protections for family members with little ones less than 18.

And while Haney in 2019 wrote legislation extending some eviction protections to models made following 1979, his most important legislative aim was advertising and marketing development of housing. For instance, in June 2019, he sponsored an ordinance approving a growth arrangement among San Francisco and KR Flower Mart LLC, for the progress of an about 6.5-acre business office and retail web site positioned at Fifth and Brannon streets that was predicted to make $166 million in community fees, with $54 million earmarked for affordable housing. That enhancement is ongoing.

Haney also sponsored neighborhood redevelopment plans intended to spur housing and workplace building and enhance a work opportunities/housing linkage cost to fund new reasonably priced housing enhancement.