Legal professionals for the 25-calendar year-outdated Congressional aide who is suing Dallas Cowboys proprietor Jerry Jones unveiled a statement Thursday expressing their shopper isn’t motivated by income but as an alternative needs a decide to toss out an arrangement “that attempts to prohibit her from stating who her actual father is.”

The lady, Alexandra Davis, who lives in Washington D.C., was not enthusiastic by “fame or fortune” when she filed her lawsuit on March 3 from Jones, alleging the billionaire is her biological father, her lawyers said in the statement.

“Ms. Davis’ lawsuit does not find the restoration of income,” wrote Davis’ attorneys, Andrew A. Bergman and Jay K. Grey, of Dallas, in a assertion produced to ESPN. “Ms. Davis’ lawsuit seeks only to have a Court declare that she is not bound to an arrangement entered into that attempts to prohibit her from stating who her actual father is. Certainly, anybody can realize this need to have of a youngster no make any difference what age to have the ability to say they have a father devoid of the worry of reprisal.”

The grievance claims that Davis “has lived her lifetime fatherless and in top secret and in anxiety that if she ought to notify any individual who her father was, she and her mom would eliminate financial aid, or worse.” Jones is alleged to have paid $375,000 to Davis’ mom, Cynthia Davis Spencer, whom the lawsuit says was courted by the Cowboys operator in 1995 when she was doing the job at the American Airlines ticket counter in Minor Rock, Arkansas.

Davis, who now functions as an aide to U.S. Rep. Ronny Jackson of Texas, has declined to comment to ESPN and other media stores considering the fact that the lawsuit became public Wednesday night. Her lawyers stated in their assertion that their client’s lawsuit was filed from Jones “only right after Ms. Davis’ quite a few makes an attempt to tackle this make any difference in non-public ended up disregarded” by Jones and his legal professionals.

Bergman declined to respond to queries outside of the assertion. Jim Wilkinson, a spokesman for Jones, also declined to comment and mentioned Jones would have no comment on the lawsuit.

The criticism alleges that when Davis was 1 year outdated, her mom signed an agreement with Jones’ pal and lawyer, Donald Jack, accepting the $375,000 payoff. But two trusts that have compensated an undisclosed total to Davis and her mother, and continue to be in impact, have resulted in Davis “never ever obtaining a legal father,” the lawsuit suggests.

“To insert outstanding insult to harm, Plaintiff has experienced to spend her entire life hiding and concealing who her real father is. Defendant Jones’ only part in Plaintiff’s existence to date other than to shun her, has been to coerce her from ever disclosing his identification.”

The complaint also claims that Charlotte Jones Anderson, a Cowboys senior government and Jones’ daughter, is now engaged in a divorce with her spouse, Shy Anderson. The lawsuit suggests that Davis Spencer was just lately subpoenaed for a deposition in the divorce proceedings, which are described in the go well with as “protracted and contentious.” The lawsuit alleges that just after Davis Spencer was subpoenaed to testify in a deposition connected to the divorce, she was contacted “by at minimum a single individual” related with Jerry Jones.

“This man or woman educated Cynthia that Defendant Jones would be really displeased if she testified at her deposition and disclosed that he was Plantiff’s father. Cynthia was explained to that Defendant Jones could, and potentially would, terminate the trusts, which at present however stand to reward Plantiffs with two lump sum payments owing to Plaintiff when she turns 2 and 28, if Cynthia testified to the fact that Defendant Jones is Plaintiff’s father.”

The lawsuit was posted on the Dallas County courts’ site Monday and as a result obtainable to associates of the general public, which includes hundreds of Texas lawyers. The team discovered the lawsuit’s submitting late Monday.

In their statement, the attorneys for Davis reported “at the request of Mr. Jones, Ms. Davis agreed to have the courtroom information briefly sealed to stay clear of publicity. Ms. Davis was hopeful in the course of this time the lawsuit could be fixed devoid of publicity. However, amongst the time the lawsuit was submitted and the Court information have been sealed, the lawsuit was found.”

It is not recognised regardless of whether attorneys for Davis and lawyers for Jones have entered into conversations on whether or not to settle the circumstance. On March 31, a hearing will be held on no matter if the courtroom information will keep on being sealed to the general public.